linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 75/93] netfilter: use fwmark_reflect in nf_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170809181338.703250811@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  9 Aug 2017 11:14:08 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
        Pau Espin Pedrol <pau.espin@...sares.net>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 75/93] netfilter: use fwmark_reflect in nf_send_reset

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Pau Espin Pedrol <pau.espin@...sares.net>


[ Upstream commit cc31d43b4154ad5a7d8aa5543255a93b7e89edc2 ]

Otherwise, RST packets generated by ipt_REJECT always have mark 0 when
the routing is checked later in the same code path.

Fixes: e110861f8609 ("net: add a sysctl to reflect the fwmark on replies")
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Pau Espin Pedrol <pau.espin@...sares.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c |    2 ++
 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c |    3 +++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.c
@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ void nf_send_reset(struct net *net, stru
 	/* ip_route_me_harder expects skb->dst to be set */
 	skb_dst_set_noref(nskb, skb_dst(oldskb));
 
+	nskb->mark = IP4_REPLY_MARK(net, oldskb->mark);
+
 	skb_reserve(nskb, LL_MAX_HEADER);
 	niph = nf_reject_iphdr_put(nskb, oldskb, IPPROTO_TCP,
 				   ip4_dst_hoplimit(skb_dst(nskb)));
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ void nf_send_reset6(struct net *net, str
 	fl6.fl6_sport = otcph->dest;
 	fl6.fl6_dport = otcph->source;
 	fl6.flowi6_oif = l3mdev_master_ifindex(skb_dst(oldskb)->dev);
+	fl6.flowi6_mark = IP6_REPLY_MARK(net, oldskb->mark);
 	security_skb_classify_flow(oldskb, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl6));
 	dst = ip6_route_output(net, NULL, &fl6);
 	if (dst->error) {
@@ -180,6 +181,8 @@ void nf_send_reset6(struct net *net, str
 
 	skb_dst_set(nskb, dst);
 
+	nskb->mark = fl6.flowi6_mark;
+
 	skb_reserve(nskb, hh_len + dst->header_len);
 	ip6h = nf_reject_ip6hdr_put(nskb, oldskb, IPPROTO_TCP,
 				    ip6_dst_hoplimit(dst));