[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170809181338.101242274@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:13:53 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 60/93] net/mlx5e: Fix wrong delay calculation for overflow check scheduling
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>
[ Upstream commit d439c84509a510e864fdc6166c760482cd03fc57 ]
The overflow_period is calculated in seconds. In order to use it
for delayed work scheduling translation to jiffies is needed.
Fixes: ef9814deafd0 ('net/mlx5e: Add HW timestamping (TS) support')
Signed-off-by: Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_clock.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_clock.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_clock.c
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ static void mlx5e_timestamp_overflow(str
write_lock_irqsave(&tstamp->lock, flags);
timecounter_read(&tstamp->clock);
write_unlock_irqrestore(&tstamp->lock, flags);
- schedule_delayed_work(&tstamp->overflow_work, tstamp->overflow_period);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&tstamp->overflow_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(tstamp->overflow_period * 1000));
}
int mlx5e_hwstamp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists