lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170809181335.925488235@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  9 Aug 2017 11:12:59 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Seraphime Kirkovski <kirkseraph@...il.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 06/93] iwlwifi: dvm: prevent an out of bounds access

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>

commit 0b0f934e92a8eaed2e6c48a50eae6f84661f74f3 upstream.

iwlagn_check_ratid_empty takes the tid as a parameter, but
it doesn't check that it is not IWL_TID_NON_QOS.
Since IWL_TID_NON_QOS = 8 and iwl_priv::tid_data is an array
with 8 entries, accessing iwl_priv::tid_data[IWL_TID_NON_QOS]
is a bad idea.
This happened in iwlagn_rx_reply_tx. Since
iwlagn_check_ratid_empty is relevant only to check whether
we can open A-MPDU, this flow is irrelevant if tid is
IWL_TID_NON_QOS. Call iwlagn_check_ratid_empty only inside
the
	if (tid != IWL_TID_NON_QOS)

a few lines earlier in the function.

Reported-by: Seraphime Kirkovski <kirkseraph@...il.com>
Tested-by: Seraphime Kirkovski <kirkseraph@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/tx.c
@@ -1190,11 +1190,11 @@ void iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv
 				next_reclaimed;
 			IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "Next reclaimed packet:%d\n",
 						  next_reclaimed);
+			iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
 		}
 
 		iwl_trans_reclaim(priv->trans, txq_id, ssn, &skbs);
 
-		iwlagn_check_ratid_empty(priv, sta_id, tid);
 		freed = 0;
 
 		/* process frames */


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ