[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5591b641-6eb0-0cb6-e74d-7e55cad5ee33@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 06:04:16 +0800
From: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<james.morse@....com>, <bp@...e.de>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
<geliangtang@...il.com>, <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <austinwc@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: apei: fix GHES estatus iteration
On 2017/8/9 8:52, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 6:32:20 PM CEST Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:32:25PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>> Currently iterating through the GHES estatus blocks does not
>>> take into account the new generic data v3 structure size. This
>>> can result in garbage non-standard trace events to be triggered
>>> since the loop will not properly iterate through the estatus
>>> blocks and not properly terminate.
>>>
>>> Update the GHES estatus iteration to properly increment through
>>> the estatus blocks similar to how the CPER estatus printing
>>> iterates through them.
>>>
>>> Fixes: bbcc2e7b642e ("ras: acpi/apei: cper: add support for generic data v3 structure")
I do not think it has relationship with this "bbcc2e7b642e", the root cause is that it
does not consider the acpi_hest_generic_data_v300, this code exists long long time ago.
so please also review this patch:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/10/747
previously I do not see Tyler's this modification, just know see it.
>>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
>>> Tested-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/apei/apei-internal.h | 5 -----
>>> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 8 +++++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> Whilst much of the initial code here went through the arm64 tree in the
>> previous merge window, I'm assuming that Boris will take this fix via his
>> tree (likewise for "[PATCH V2] acpi: apei: clear error status before
>> acknowledging the error").
>
> Actually I will if Boris ACKs these.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists