linux-kernel - RE: [v6] wlcore: add missing nvs file name info for wilink8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8665E2433BC68541A24DFFCA87B70F5B36422E83@DFRE01.ent.ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 07:56:49 +0000
From:   "Reizer, Eyal" <eyalr@...com>
To:     Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
CC:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk" 
        <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: RE: [v6] wlcore: add missing nvs file name info for wilink8

> 
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Reizer, Eyal <eyalr@...com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Sorry for top posting (mobile...)
> >> > I have verified with system design and the data sheet that every wilink
> 6/7
> >> chip has a mac address in fuse so probably the board you have (pretty old,
> >> right?) has this mac address in fuse. Maybe it was from very early
> batches?
> >> Anyway I see no reason to change it.
> >> > Anyway the calibrator can be used to store a different one into the nvs
> file
> >> that will overide it.
> >>
> >> Well clearly at least this one does not have any valid hardware
> >> mac address, the hardware mac address is broken with all zeroes.
> >>
> >
> > Looks like it is not really all zeros but rather 00:00:00:00:00:01.
> > I wonder if it is just a one board issue or not...
> 
> It's 00:00:00:00:00:01 because your code adds 1 to it.
> 
You are right of course!
I saw it as well after sending my previous reply.

Best Regards,
Eyal