lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69845fb9-ccef-9172-321d-f0c319eaea17@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:45:35 +0800
From:   Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To:     "liwei (CM)" <liwei213@...wei.com>,
        "ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        "jh80.chung@...sung.com" <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        "wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com" <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
        "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "guodong.xu@...aro.org" <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        "Fengbaopeng (kevin, Kirin Solution Dept)" 
        <fengbaopeng@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH v9 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc-k3: add sd support for hi3660

On 2017/8/9 14:56, liwei (CM) wrote:
> Hi, Shawn
> Thank you for your patience and carefulness, I'm sorry maybe I miss your comments.
> 1.for the changelog,do you me as following:
> 【liwei】Major changes in v8:
>       - modify patch v7 name and dependency order.
>      
>      Major changes in v9:
>       - solve review comments for Ulf Hansson.
>         *use mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() instead of regulator_set_voltage().
>

Firstly send the patch to yourself and check it in your inbox and you
could see that there is already a '------' between your commit msg and
the files you change. So inline your changelog there.


>      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2. some of this macro newly added aren't used anywhere.
> 【liwei】yes, PULL_DOWN BIT(1) / PULL_UP   BIT(0) aren't used anywhere, I will remove them in patch v10
> 
> 3. > +#define SDMMC_UHS_REG_EXT	0x108
>> +#define SDMMC_ENABLE_SHIFT	0x110
> 【liwei】They modified at patch v4, I move common register for dwmmc controller to dwmmc header file, and they are used as following in dw_mci_hs_set_timing()
> 	mci_writel(host, UHS_REG_EXT, reg_value);
> 	mci_writel(host, ENABLE_SHIFT, enable_shift);
> 
> 4. Does it work for hard-coding the delay timing? All the different boards with different cards work fine?
> And tuning process is also work for SDR50 although it's optional. So how would that work for your case?
> 【liwei】Yes, they work fine with different boards with different cards, we tested it. In fact, these values are the generally appropriate values given by our controller chip colleagues.
> 	    For SDR50 it will not come into dw_mci_hi3660_execute_tuning() and use the given value in hs_timing_cfg[][]{} when dw_mci_hi3660_init();
> 
> 5. > +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_PHASES; ++i, ++smpl_phase) {
>> +		smpl_phase %= 32;
>> +
>> +		mci_writel(host, TMOUT, ~0);
> 
> Why you need this?
> 【liwei】This is what SDR104 needs to find the optimum phase point.

I meant I didn't get the point of why you set the TMOUT here.

Tips: For further wise, please don't top post and inline your answer
in the previous mail so that we could better trace down the issue
we are talking about.

> 
> Thank you again and look forward to your reply!
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Shawn Lin [mailto:shawn.lin@...k-chips.com]
> 发送时间: 2017年8月9日 11:48
> 收件人: liwei (CM); ulf.hansson@...aro.org; jh80.chung@...sung.com; wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com; hkallweit1@...il.com; linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> 抄送: adrian.hunter@...el.com; shawn.lin@...k-chips.com; guodong.xu@...aro.org
> 主题: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc-k3: add sd support for hi3660
> 
> 
> On 2017/8/9 11:25, Li Wei wrote:
>> Add sd card support for hi3660 soc
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei213@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <chenjun14@...wei.com>
>>
> 
> I did some comment for your v6 but probably you miss them.
> 
> And it's still incorrect for your changelog.....
> 
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> Major changes in v3:
>>    - solve review comments from Heiner Kallweit.
>>      *use the GENMASK and FIELD_PREP macros replace the bit shift operation.
>>      *use usleep_range() replace udelay() and mdelay().
>>
>> Major changes in v4:
>>    - solve review comments from Jaehoon Chung.
>>      *move common register for dwmmc controller to dwmmc header file.
>>      *modify definitions type of some register variables.
>>      *get rid of the magic numbers.
>>
>> Major changes in v5:
>>    - further improve coding style.
>>
>> Major changes in v6:
>>    - solve review comments for Jaehoon Chung.
>>      *modify dw_mci_hi3660_set_ios() to static.
>>      *fix the comment style.
>>
>> Major changes in v7:
>>    - solve review comments for John Stultz.
>>      *remove reset code in dw_mmc-k3.c,use reset in core mmc.
>>
>> Major changes in v8:
>>    - modify patch v7 name and dependency order.
>>
>> Major changes in v9:
>>    - solve review comments for Ulf Hansson.
>>      *use mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() instead of regulator_set_voltage().
>> ---
> 
> should be here...
> 
>>    drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c | 301 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>    drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h    |   2 +
>>    2 files changed, 303 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
>> b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c index e38fb0020bb1..f6910bed55ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-k3.c
>> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>>     * (at your option) any later version.
>>     */
>>    
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>>    #include <linux/clk.h>
>>    #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>>    #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>> @@ -28,7 +30,38 @@
>>    #define AO_SCTRL_SEL18		BIT(10)
>>    #define AO_SCTRL_CTRL3		0x40C
>>    
>> +#define DWMMC_SDIO_ID 2
>> +
>> +#define SOC_SCTRL_SCPERCTRL5    (0x314)
>> +#define SDCARD_IO_SEL18         BIT(2)
>> +
>> +#define SDCARD_RD_THRESHOLD  (512)
>> +
>> +#define GENCLK_DIV (7)
>> +
>> +#define GPIO_CLK_ENABLE                   BIT(16)
>> +#define GPIO_CLK_DIV_MASK                 GENMASK(11, 8)
>> +#define GPIO_USE_SAMPLE_DLY_MASK          GENMASK(13, 13)
>> +#define UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_PHASE_MASK     GENMASK(20, 16)
>> +#define UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_DRVPHASE_MASK  GENMASK(25, 21)
>> +#define UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_DLY_MASK       GENMASK(30, 26)
>> +
>> +#define TIMING_MODE     3
>> +#define TIMING_CFG_NUM 10
>> +
>> +#define PULL_DOWN BIT(1)
>> +#define PULL_UP   BIT(0)
>> +
>> +#define NUM_PHASES (40)
>> +
>> +#define ENABLE_SHIFT_MIN_SMPL (4)
>> +#define ENABLE_SHIFT_MAX_SMPL (12)
>> +#define USE_DLY_MIN_SMPL (11)
>> +#define USE_DLY_MAX_SMPL (14)
>> +
> 
> I said some of this macro newly added aren't used anywhere.
> 
>>    struct k3_priv {
>> +	int ctrl_id;
>> +	u32 cur_speed;
>>    	struct regmap	*reg;
>>    };
>>    
>> @@ -38,6 +71,41 @@ static unsigned long dw_mci_hi6220_caps[] = {
>>    	0
>>    };
>>    
>> +struct hs_timing {
>> +	u32 drv_phase;
>> +	u32 smpl_dly;
>> +	u32 smpl_phase_max;
>> +	u32 smpl_phase_min;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct hs_timing hs_timing_cfg[TIMING_MODE][TIMING_CFG_NUM] = {
>> +	{ /* reserved */ },
>> +	{ /* SD */
>> +		{7, 0, 15, 15,},  /* 0: LEGACY 400k */
>> +		{6, 0,  4,  4,},  /* 1: MMC_HS */
>> +		{6, 0,  3,  3,},  /* 2: SD_HS */
>> +		{6, 0, 15, 15,},  /* 3: SDR12 */
>> +		{6, 0,  2,  2,},  /* 4: SDR25 */
>> +		{4, 0, 11,  0,},  /* 5: SDR50 */
>> +		{6, 4, 15,  0,},  /* 6: SDR104 */
>> +		{0},              /* 7: DDR50 */
>> +		{0},              /* 8: DDR52 */
>> +		{0},              /* 9: HS200 */
>> +	},
>> +	{ /* SDIO */
>> +		{7, 0, 15, 15,},  /* 0: LEGACY 400k */
>> +		{0},              /* 1: MMC_HS */
>> +		{6, 0, 15, 15,},  /* 2: SD_HS */
>> +		{6, 0, 15, 15,},  /* 3: SDR12 */
>> +		{6, 0,  0,  0,},  /* 4: SDR25 */
>> +		{4, 0, 12,  0,},  /* 5: SDR50 */
>> +		{5, 4, 15,  0,},  /* 6: SDR104 */
>> +		{0},              /* 7: DDR50 */
>> +		{0},              /* 8: DDR52 */
>> +		{0},              /* 9: HS200 */
>> +	}
>> +};
>> +
> 
> Does it work for hard-coding the delay timing? All the different boards with different cards work fine?
> 
> And tuning process is also work for SDR50 although it's optional. So how would that work for your case?
> 
>>    static void dw_mci_k3_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>>    {
>>    	int ret;
>> @@ -66,6 +134,10 @@ static int dw_mci_hi6220_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>>    	if (IS_ERR(priv->reg))
>>    		priv->reg = NULL;
>>    
>> +	priv->ctrl_id = of_alias_get_id(host->dev->of_node, "mshc");
>> +	if (priv->ctrl_id < 0)
>> +		priv->ctrl_id = 0;
>> +
>>    	host->priv = priv;
>>    	return 0;
>>    }
>> @@ -144,7 +216,236 @@ static const struct dw_mci_drv_data hi6220_data = {
>>    	.execute_tuning		= dw_mci_hi6220_execute_tuning,
>>    };
>>    
>> +static void dw_mci_hs_set_timing(struct dw_mci *host, int timing,
>> +				     int smpl_phase)
>> +{
>> +	u32 drv_phase;
>> +	u32 smpl_dly;
>> +	u32 use_smpl_dly = 0;
>> +	u32 enable_shift = 0;
>> +	u32 reg_value;
>> +	int ctrl_id;
>> +	struct k3_priv *priv;
>> +
>> +	priv = host->priv;
>> +	ctrl_id = priv->ctrl_id;
>> +
>> +	drv_phase = hs_timing_cfg[ctrl_id][timing].drv_phase;
>> +	smpl_dly   = hs_timing_cfg[ctrl_id][timing].smpl_dly;
>> +	if (smpl_phase == -1)
>> +		smpl_phase = (hs_timing_cfg[ctrl_id][timing].smpl_phase_max +
>> +			     hs_timing_cfg[ctrl_id][timing].smpl_phase_min) / 2;
>> +
>> +	switch (timing) {
>> +	case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104:
>> +		if (smpl_phase >= USE_DLY_MIN_SMPL &&
>> +				smpl_phase <= USE_DLY_MAX_SMPL)
>> +			use_smpl_dly = 1;
>> +			/* fallthrough */
>> +	case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50:
>> +		if (smpl_phase >= ENABLE_SHIFT_MIN_SMPL &&
>> +				smpl_phase <= ENABLE_SHIFT_MAX_SMPL)
>> +			enable_shift = 1;
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mci_writel(host, GPIO, 0x0);
>> +	usleep_range(5, 10);
>> +
>> +	reg_value = FIELD_PREP(UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_PHASE_MASK, smpl_phase) |
>> +		    FIELD_PREP(UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_DLY_MASK, smpl_dly) |
>> +		    FIELD_PREP(UHS_REG_EXT_SAMPLE_DRVPHASE_MASK, drv_phase);
>> +	mci_writel(host, UHS_REG_EXT, reg_value);
>> +
>> +	mci_writel(host, ENABLE_SHIFT, enable_shift);
>> +
>> +	reg_value = FIELD_PREP(GPIO_CLK_DIV_MASK, GENCLK_DIV) |
>> +			     FIELD_PREP(GPIO_USE_SAMPLE_DLY_MASK, use_smpl_dly);
>> +	mci_writel(host, GPIO, (unsigned int)reg_value | GPIO_CLK_ENABLE);
>> +
>> +	/* We should delay 1ms wait for timing setting finished. */
>> +	usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_mci_hi3660_init(struct dw_mci *host) {
>> +	mci_writel(host, CDTHRCTL, SDMMC_SET_THLD(SDCARD_RD_THRESHOLD,
>> +		    SDMMC_CARD_RD_THR_EN));
>> +
>> +	dw_mci_hs_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_LEGACY, -1);
>> +	host->bus_hz /= (GENCLK_DIV + 1);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_mci_set_sel18(struct dw_mci *host, bool set) {
>> +	int ret;
>> +	unsigned int val;
>> +	struct k3_priv *priv;
>> +
>> +	priv = host->priv;
>> +
>> +	val = set ? SDCARD_IO_SEL18 : 0;
>> +	ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->reg, SOC_SCTRL_SCPERCTRL5,
>> +				 SDCARD_IO_SEL18, val);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(host->dev, "sel18 %u error\n", val);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_mci_hi3660_set_ios(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_ios
>> +*ios) {
>> +	int ret;
>> +	unsigned long wanted;
>> +	unsigned long actual;
>> +	struct k3_priv *priv = host->priv;
>> +
>> +	if (!ios->clock || ios->clock == priv->cur_speed)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	wanted = ios->clock * (GENCLK_DIV + 1);
>> +	ret = clk_set_rate(host->ciu_clk, wanted);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(host->dev, "failed to set rate %luHz\n", wanted);
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +	actual = clk_get_rate(host->ciu_clk);
>> +
>> +	dw_mci_hs_set_timing(host, ios->timing, -1);
>> +	host->bus_hz = actual / (GENCLK_DIV + 1);
>> +	host->current_speed = 0;
>> +	priv->cur_speed = host->bus_hz;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_mci_get_best_clksmpl(unsigned int sample_flag) {
>> +	int i;
>> +	int interval;
>> +	unsigned int v;
>> +	unsigned int len;
>> +	unsigned int range_start = 0;
>> +	unsigned int range_length = 0;
>> +	unsigned int middle_range = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (!sample_flag)
>> +		return -EIO;
>> +
>> +	if (~sample_flag == 0)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	i = ffs(sample_flag) - 1;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	* A clock cycle is divided into 32 phases,
>> +	* each of which is represented by a bit,
>> +	* finding the optimal phase.
>> +	*/
>> +	while (i < 32) {
>> +		v = ror32(sample_flag, i);
>> +		len = ffs(~v) - 1;
>> +
>> +		if (len > range_length) {
>> +			range_length = len;
>> +			range_start = i;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		interval = ffs(v >> len) - 1;
>> +		if (interval < 0)
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		i += len + interval;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	middle_range = range_start + range_length / 2;
>> +	if (middle_range >= 32)
>> +		middle_range %= 32;
>> +
>> +	return middle_range;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_mci_hi3660_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32
>> +opcode) {
>> +	int i = 0;
>> +	struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
>> +	struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
>> +	int smpl_phase = 0;
>> +	u32 tuning_sample_flag = 0;
>> +	int best_clksmpl = 0;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_PHASES; ++i, ++smpl_phase) {
>> +		smpl_phase %= 32;
>> +
>> +		mci_writel(host, TMOUT, ~0);
> 
> Why you need this?
> 
>> +		dw_mci_hs_set_timing(host, mmc->ios.timing, smpl_phase);
>> +
>> +		if (!mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL))
>> +			tuning_sample_flag |= (1 << smpl_phase);
>> +		else
>> +			tuning_sample_flag &= ~(1 << smpl_phase);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	best_clksmpl = dw_mci_get_best_clksmpl(tuning_sample_flag);
>> +	if (best_clksmpl < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(host->dev, "All phases bad!\n");
>> +		return -EIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dw_mci_hs_set_timing(host, mmc->ios.timing, best_clksmpl);
>> +
>> +	dev_info(host->dev, "tuning ok best_clksmpl %u tuning_sample_flag %x\n",
>> +		 best_clksmpl, tuning_sample_flag);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dw_mci_hi3660_switch_voltage(struct mmc_host *mmc,
>> +					struct mmc_ios *ios)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct dw_mci_slot *slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> +	struct k3_priv *priv;
>> +	struct dw_mci *host;
>> +
>> +	host = slot->host;
>> +	priv = host->priv;
>> +
>> +	if (!priv || !priv->reg)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	if (priv->ctrl_id == DWMMC_SDIO_ID)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330)
>> +		ret = dw_mci_set_sel18(host, 0);
>> +	else if (ios->signal_voltage == MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180)
>> +		ret = dw_mci_set_sel18(host, 1);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc)) {
>> +		ret = mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, ios);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(host->dev, "Regulator set error %d\n", ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct dw_mci_drv_data hi3660_data = {
>> +	.init = dw_mci_hi3660_init,
>> +	.set_ios = dw_mci_hi3660_set_ios,
>> +	.parse_dt = dw_mci_hi6220_parse_dt,
>> +	.execute_tuning = dw_mci_hi3660_execute_tuning,
>> +	.switch_voltage  = dw_mci_hi3660_switch_voltage, };
>> +
>>    static const struct of_device_id dw_mci_k3_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3660-dw-mshc", .data = &hi3660_data, },
>>    	{ .compatible = "hisilicon,hi4511-dw-mshc", .data = &k3_drv_data, },
>>    	{ .compatible = "hisilicon,hi6220-dw-mshc", .data = &hi6220_data, },
>>    	{},
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>> index 75da3756955d..5403758bf621 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
>> @@ -314,6 +314,8 @@ struct dw_mci_board {
>>    #define SDMMC_DSCADDR		0x094
>>    #define SDMMC_BUFADDR		0x098
>>    #define SDMMC_CDTHRCTL		0x100
>> +#define SDMMC_UHS_REG_EXT	0x108
>> +#define SDMMC_ENABLE_SHIFT	0x110
> 
> where you use these two?
> 
>>    #define SDMMC_DATA(x)		(x)
>>    /*
>>    * Registers to support idmac 64-bit address mode
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ