[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170810092145.6avlhvepnneh3swm@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:21:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, walken@...gle.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, kirill@...temov.name,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com,
kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:30:54AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> With a little feedback, it rather makes us a bit confused between
> XHLOCK_NR and MAX_XHLOCK_NR. what about the following?
>
> +enum xhlock_context_t {
> + XHLOCK_HARD,
> + XHLOCK_SOFT,
> + XHLOCK_PROC,
> + XHLOCK_CXT_NR,
> +};
>
> But it's trivial. I like yours, too.
grep -l "XHLOCK_NR" `quilt series` | while read file; do sed -i
's/XHLOCK_NR/XHLOCK_CTX_NR/g' $file; done
:-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists