[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bff1793-fe46-f263-fbf5-ef65ffbc5dc9@rock-chips.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:57:40 +0800
From: "David.Wu" <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, heiko@...ech.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
olof@...om.net, linux@...linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
huangtao@...k-chips.com, hwg@...k-chips.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] Documentation: net: phy: Add phy-is-internal
binding
Hi Andrew, Florian
在 2017/8/10 8:20, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> Hi Florian, David.
>
> I'm happy with the property name. But i think the text needs more
> description. We deal with Ethernet switches with integrated PHYs. Yet
> for us, this property is unneeded.
>
> Seeing this property means some bit of software needs to ensure the
> internal PHY should be used, when given the choice between an internal
> and external PHY. So i would say something like:
>
> If set, indicates that the PHY is integrated into the same
> physical package as the Ethernet MAC. If needed, muxers should be
> configured to ensure the (internal) PHY is used. The absence of this
> property indicates the muxers should be configured so that the
> external PHY is used.
Are we supposed to replace the words "internal" with "integrated" here?
So we have three kinds of PHY, they are intenal, external and integrated
PHYs.
>
> This last part is important. If the bootloader has set the internal
> PHY to be used, you need to reset it. Otherwise we are going to get
> into a mess sometime later and need to add a phy-is-external property.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists