| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170810013216.GX20323@X58A-UD3R>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:32:16 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, walken@...gle.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, kirill@...temov.name,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org, npiggin@...il.com,
kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring
buffer overwrite
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:16:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hehe, _another_ scheme...
>
> Yes I think this works.. but I had just sort of understood the last one.
>
> How about I do this on top? That I think is a combination of what I
> proposed last and your single invalidate thing. Combined they solve the
> problem with the least amount of extra storage (a single int).
I'm sorry for saying that.. I'm not sure if this works well.
> ---
> Subject: lockdep: Simplify xhlock ring buffer invalidation
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Wed Aug 9 15:31:27 CEST 2017
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> include/linux/lockdep.h | 20 -----------
> include/linux/sched.h | 4 --
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -284,26 +284,6 @@ struct held_lock {
> */
> struct hist_lock {
> /*
> - * Id for each entry in the ring buffer. This is used to
> - * decide whether the ring buffer was overwritten or not.
> - *
> - * For example,
> - *
> - * |<----------- hist_lock ring buffer size ------->|
> - * pppppppppppppppppppppiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
> - * wrapped > iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.......................
> - *
> - * where 'p' represents an acquisition in process
> - * context, 'i' represents an acquisition in irq
> - * context.
> - *
> - * In this example, the ring buffer was overwritten by
> - * acquisitions in irq context, that should be detected on
> - * rollback or commit.
> - */
> - unsigned int hist_id;
> -
> - /*
> * Seperate stack_trace data. This will be used at commit step.
> */
> struct stack_trace trace;
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -855,9 +855,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> unsigned int xhlock_idx;
> /* For restoring at history boundaries */
> unsigned int xhlock_idx_hist[XHLOCK_NR];
> - unsigned int hist_id;
> - /* For overwrite check at each context exit */
> - unsigned int hist_id_save[XHLOCK_NR];
> + unsigned int xhlock_idx_max;
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -4818,26 +4818,65 @@ void crossrelease_hist_start(enum contex
> {
> struct task_struct *cur = current;
>
> - if (cur->xhlocks) {
> + if (cur->xhlocks)
> cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = cur->xhlock_idx;
> - cur->hist_id_save[c] = cur->hist_id;
> - }
> }
>
> void crossrelease_hist_end(enum context_t c)
> {
> struct task_struct *cur = current;
> + unsigned int idx;
>
> - if (cur->xhlocks) {
> - unsigned int idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
> - struct hist_lock *h = &xhlock(idx);
> -
> - cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
> -
> - /* Check if the ring was overwritten. */
> - if (h->hist_id != cur->hist_id_save[c])
> - invalidate_xhlock(h);
> - }
> + if (!cur->xhlocks)
> + return;
> +
> + idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
> + cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
> +
> + /*
> + * A bit of magic here.. this deals with rewinding the (cyclic) history
> + * array further than its size. IOW. looses the complete history.
> + *
> + * We detect this by tracking the previous oldest entry we've (over)
> + * written in @xhlock_idx_max, this means the next entry is the oldest
> + * entry still in the buffer, ie. its tail.
> + *
> + * So when we restore an @xhlock_idx that is at least MAX_XHLOCKS_NR
> + * older than @xhlock_idx_max we know we've just wiped the entire
> + * history.
> + */
> + if ((cur->xhlock_idx_max - idx) < MAX_XHLOCKS_NR)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Now that we know the buffer is effectively empty, reset our state
> + * such that it appears empty (without in fact clearing the entire
> + * buffer).
> + *
> + * Pick @idx as the 'new' beginning, (re)set all save-points to not
> + * rewind past it and reset the max. Then invalidate this idx such that
> + * commit_xhlocks() will never rewind past it. Since xhlock_idx_inc()
> + * will return the _next_ entry, we'll not overwrite this invalid entry
> + * until the entire buffer is full again.
> + */
> + for (c = 0; c < XHLOCK_NR; c++)
> + cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = idx;
> + cur->xhlock_idx_max = idx;
> + invalidate_xhlock(&xhlock(idx));
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int xhlock_idx_inc(void)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *cur = current;
> + unsigned int idx = ++cur->xhlock_idx;
> +
> + /*
> + * As per the requirement in crossrelease_hist_end(), track the tail.
> + */
> + if ((int)(cur->xhlock_idx_max - idx) < 0)
> + cur->xhlock_idx_max = idx;
> +
> + return idx;
> }
>
> static int cross_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
> @@ -4902,7 +4941,7 @@ static inline int xhlock_valid(struct hi
> */
> static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock)
> {
> - unsigned int idx = ++current->xhlock_idx;
> + unsigned int idx = xhlock_idx_inc();
> struct hist_lock *xhlock = &xhlock(idx);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
> @@ -4915,7 +4954,6 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock
>
> /* Initialize hist_lock's members */
> xhlock->hlock = *hlock;
> - xhlock->hist_id = current->hist_id++;
>
> xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0;
> xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES;
> @@ -5071,7 +5109,6 @@ static int commit_xhlock(struct cross_lo
> static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_lock *xlock)
> {
> unsigned int cur = current->xhlock_idx;
> - unsigned int prev_hist_id = xhlock(cur).hist_id;
> unsigned int i;
>
> if (!graph_lock())
> @@ -5091,17 +5128,6 @@ static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_
> break;
>
> /*
> - * Filter out the cases that the ring buffer was
> - * overwritten and the previous entry has a bigger
> - * hist_id than the following one, which is impossible
> - * otherwise.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(before(xhlock->hist_id, prev_hist_id)))
> - break;
> -
> - prev_hist_id = xhlock->hist_id;
> -
> - /*
> * commit_xhlock() returns 0 with graph_lock already
> * released if fail.
> */
> @@ -5186,11 +5212,9 @@ void lockdep_init_task(struct task_struc
> int i;
>
> task->xhlock_idx = UINT_MAX;
> - task->hist_id = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < XHLOCK_NR; i++) {
> task->xhlock_idx_hist[i] = UINT_MAX;
> - task->hist_id_save[i] = 0;
> }
>
> task->xhlocks = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hist_lock) * MAX_XHLOCKS_NR,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists