lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:08:12 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: drop broken RPM status update
 from suspend_noirq

* Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> [170726 01:36]:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:17:17AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> [170726 00:51]:
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:48:40PM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > > > So, thank you for your patches and sorry for the noise.
> > > > 
> > > > Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> > > 
> > > Thanks for testing.
> > 
> > So does the patch description need updating?
> 
> I don't think so.
> 
> I did notice that I left out a "would" in the final sentence
> 
> 	"and either way, any such calls *would* have been causing
> 	crashes since 4.10"
> 	
> which perhaps you could add when applying?
> 
> > And this is needed as a fix for the -rc cycle in addition to your musb
> > patch?
> 
> Unlike the musb patch, this one is not critical and could possibly wait
> for 4.14. But since all it does is to get rid of a (since 4.10) broken
> state update, and thereby those warning messages on suspend, I'd say
> it's -rc material.

Applying into omap-for-v4.13/fixes finally thanks.

Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ