[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170810171433.obchokljs43rmgk4@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:14:34 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix pmem interface definition
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 04:52:31PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Defining the two functions as 'static inline' and exporting them
> leads to the interesting case where we can use the interface
> from loadable modules, but not from built-in drivers, as shown
> in this link failure:
>
> vers/nvdimm/claim.o: In function `nsio_rw_bytes':
> claim.c:(.text+0x1b8): undefined reference to `arch_invalidate_pmem'
> drivers/nvdimm/pmem.o: In function `pmem_dax_flush':
> pmem.c:(.text+0x11c): undefined reference to `arch_wb_cache_pmem'
> drivers/nvdimm/pmem.o: In function `pmem_make_request':
> pmem.c:(.text+0x5a4): undefined reference to `arch_invalidate_pmem'
> pmem.c:(.text+0x650): undefined reference to `arch_invalidate_pmem'
> pmem.c:(.text+0x6d4): undefined reference to `arch_invalidate_pmem'
>
> This removes the bogus 'static inline'.
>
> Fixes: d50e071fdaa3 ("arm64: Implement pmem API support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Applied. Thanks.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists