[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170810195246.GA951@mbp>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 22:52:46 +0300
From: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com>
To: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/29] drm/rockchip: switch to drm_*_get(),
drm_*_put() helpers
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:16:08PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 03:10:04PM +0300, Cihangir Akturk wrote:
> > Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference()
> > and drm_*_unreference() helpers.
> >
> > drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just
> > compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() and should not be
> > used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to
> > use the new APIs.
> >
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/drm-get-put.cocci
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@...il.com>
>
> Hi Cihangir,
> Thank you for the patch. Unfortunately it does not apply to drm-misc-next. Could
> you please resend with conflicts resolved?
OK, I'll send a v3 based on drm-next. And should I drop patches from
v1 already pulled in drm-next?
Thanks, Cihangir
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists