[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <d86671cfde823b50477cd2f6f548dfe54871e24d.1502401017.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:37:25 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] objtool: Fix validate_branch() return codes
The validate_branch() function should never return a negative value.
Errors are treated as warnings so that even if something goes wrong,
objtool does its best to generate ORC data for the rest of the file.
Fixes: baa41469a7b9 ("objtool: Implement stack validation 2.0")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 4f0c4aea8f6f..5814e907f8c2 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *first,
if (insn->alt_group && list_empty(&insn->alts)) {
WARN_FUNC("don't know how to handle branch to middle of alternative instruction group",
sec, insn->offset);
- return -1;
+ return 1;
}
while (1) {
@@ -1543,7 +1543,7 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *first,
if (func && insn->ignore) {
WARN_FUNC("BUG: why am I validating an ignored function?",
sec, insn->offset);
- return -1;
+ return 1;
}
if (insn->visited) {
@@ -1681,7 +1681,7 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *first,
case INSN_STACK:
if (update_insn_state(insn, &state))
- return -1;
+ return 1;
break;
--
2.13.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists