linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:43:52 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree

Hi Paul,

After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:

kernel/sched/core.c: In function 'do_task_dead':
kernel/sched/core.c:3385:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_spinlock' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  smp_mb__before_spinlock();
  ^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Caused by commit

  4a6fc6107e90 ("sched: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair")

Interacting with commit

  a9668cd6ee28 ("locking: Remove smp_mb__before_spinlock()")

from the tip tree.

I applied this patch for now, but I assume something better is required.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:32:10 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] sched: temporary hack for locking: Remove smp_mb__before_spinlock()

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2bd00feaea15..a4f4ba2e3be6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3382,7 +3382,7 @@ void __noreturn do_task_dead(void)
 	 * To avoid it, we have to wait for releasing tsk->pi_lock which
 	 * is held by try_to_wake_up()
 	 */
-	smp_mb__before_spinlock();
+	smp_mb();
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&current->pi_lock);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&current->pi_lock);
 
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell