[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170811144352.585085e2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:43:52 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rcu tree
Hi Paul,
After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
kernel/sched/core.c: In function 'do_task_dead':
kernel/sched/core.c:3385:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_spinlock' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
smp_mb__before_spinlock();
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Caused by commit
4a6fc6107e90 ("sched: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair")
Interacting with commit
a9668cd6ee28 ("locking: Remove smp_mb__before_spinlock()")
from the tip tree.
I applied this patch for now, but I assume something better is required.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:32:10 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] sched: temporary hack for locking: Remove smp_mb__before_spinlock()
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2bd00feaea15..a4f4ba2e3be6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3382,7 +3382,7 @@ void __noreturn do_task_dead(void)
* To avoid it, we have to wait for releasing tsk->pi_lock which
* is held by try_to_wake_up()
*/
- smp_mb__before_spinlock();
+ smp_mb();
raw_spin_lock_irq(¤t->pi_lock);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(¤t->pi_lock);
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists