[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170811175326.36d546dc@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:53:26 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in:
include/linux/mm_types.h
mm/huge_memory.c
between commit:
8b1b436dd1cc ("mm, locking: Rework {set,clear,mm}_tlb_flush_pending()")
from the tip tree and commits:
16af97dc5a89 ("mm: migrate: prevent racy access to tlb_flush_pending")
a9b802500ebb ("Revert "mm: numa: defer TLB flush for THP migration as long as possible"")
from the akpm-current tree.
The latter 2 are now in Linus' tree as well (but were not when I started
the day).
The only way forward I could see was to revert
8b1b436dd1cc ("mm, locking: Rework {set,clear,mm}_tlb_flush_pending()")
and the three following commits
ff7a5fb0f1d5 ("overlayfs, locking: Remove smp_mb__before_spinlock() usage")
d89e588ca408 ("locking: Introduce smp_mb__after_spinlock()")
a9668cd6ee28 ("locking: Remove smp_mb__before_spinlock()")
before merging the akpm-current tree again.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists