linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170811115607.p2vgqcp7w3wurhvw@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:56:07 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip
 tree


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:34:49 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 05:53:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in:
> > > 
> > >   include/linux/mm_types.h
> > >   mm/huge_memory.c
> > > 
> > > between commit:
> > > 
> > >   8b1b436dd1cc ("mm, locking: Rework {set,clear,mm}_tlb_flush_pending()")
> > > 
> > > from the tip tree and commits:
> > > 
> > >   16af97dc5a89 ("mm: migrate: prevent racy access to tlb_flush_pending")
> > >   a9b802500ebb ("Revert "mm: numa: defer TLB flush for THP migration as long as possible"")
> > > 
> > > from the akpm-current tree.
> > > 
> > > The latter 2 are now in Linus' tree as well (but were not when I started
> > > the day).
> >
> > Here's two patches that apply on top of tip.
> 
> What I will really need (on Monday) is a merge resolution between
> Linus' tree and the tip tree ...

I've done a minimal conflict resolution merge locally. Peter, could you please 
double check my resolution, in:

  040cca3ab2f6: Merge branch 'linus' into locking/core, to resolve conflicts

Thanks,

	Ingo