lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42e6baac-5b3f-5499-782f-9a8d901cac00@xilinx.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:31:36 +0200
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
        Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@...inx.com>,
        Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] char: xilinx_hwicap: Fix warnings in the driver

On 10.8.2017 20:16, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
>> On 4.8.2017 00:32, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:17:26PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> From: Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@...inx.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes the below warning
>>>>         --> Use #include <linux/io.h> instead of <asm/io.h>
>>>>         --> Use #include <linux/uaccess.h> instead of <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>>         --> please, no space before tabs
>>>>         --> Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
>>>>         --> Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
>>>>         --> Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>>>>         --> Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
>>>>         --> braces {} are not necessary for any arm of this statement
>>>>         --> DT compatible string "xlnx,opb-hwicap-1.00.b"
>>>>          appears un-documented
>>>>         --> DT compatible string "xlnx,xps-hwicap-1.00.a"
>>>>             appears un-documented
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <navam@...inx.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/xilinx.txt |  2 ++
>>>
>>> It's preferred to split bindings to separate patches. No need unless you
>>> respin:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>
>> thanks. Was there any outcome from that discussion to extract binding
>> out of kernel source code?
> 
> Well, the reason to split the patches is so the history of the
> filtered DT repository we generate from the kernel tree[1] looks
> saner.
> 

So many merge commits. It looks weird.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/log/

> As far as actually moving things out, no there's not been any
> movement. My biggest concern with moving things out would be the loss
> of kernel subsystem maintainers' review. Once it's a separate tree and
> not merged thru their tree, we'd loose their reviews and I don't have
> confidence that we'd be gaining reviews from other places. Though some
> subsystem maintainers merge bindings and don't look at them already.

ok.

Thanks,
Michal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ