[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170812130208.2ed84b76@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 13:02:08 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
Cc: knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, wsa@...-dreams.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] iio: srf08: add buffered to device mode
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 01:26:09 +0200
Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de> wrote:
> Add INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED and INDIO_BUFFER_SOFTWARE to device mode
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
> ---
> drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> index a63c272c3b22..ea238ab1066c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> @@ -437,7 +437,9 @@ static int srf08_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> indio_dev->name = id->name;
> indio_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev;
> - indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE
> + | INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED
Huh.? Firstly I think only one of these is relevant and secondly
should be merged back into the original patch that added the support.
Also the triggered_buffer setup already set it for you...
So all in all, drop this patch.
Jonathan
> + | INDIO_BUFFER_SOFTWARE;
>
> /* srf02 is not using sensitivity nor max_range */
> if (id->driver_data == SRF02)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists