linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: store the intended structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708131640300.2129@hadrien>
Date:   Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:41:51 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: store the intended structure



On Sun, 13 Aug 2017, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 15:24 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Normally the values in the resource field and the argument to ARRAY_SIZE
> > in the num_resources are the same.  In this case, the value in the reousrce
> > field is the same as the one in the previous platform_device structure, and
> > appears to be a copy-paste error.  Replace the value in the resource field
> > with the argument to the local call to ARRAY_SIZE.
>
> found by a script or eyeballs?

A script that was looking for something else.  But I wrote a script for
this specific issue and this was the only match.  I am currently checking
in a more general way.

julia