[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <230e56f6-3dd9-5e6e-fa06-df22d61e0831@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 16:48:10 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Junil Lee <junil0814.lee@....com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
William Roberts <william.c.roberts@...el.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] selinux: Delete an unnecessary return statement in
ebitmap_destroy()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 15:50:26 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
Thus remove such a statement in the affected function.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
security/selinux/ss/ebitmap.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/ebitmap.c b/security/selinux/ss/ebitmap.c
index 03581d7ef817..697bd748760a 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/ebitmap.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/ebitmap.c
@@ -339,7 +339,6 @@ void ebitmap_destroy(struct ebitmap *e)
e->highbit = 0;
e->node = NULL;
- return;
}
int ebitmap_read(struct ebitmap *e, void *fp)
--
2.14.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists