[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170814123725.GA2238@katana>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 14:37:26 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
pmeerw@...erw.net, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iio: srf08: add device tree binding for srf02 and
srf10
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:39:18PM +0200, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> schrieb am Mon, 14. Aug 11:11:
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:59:41AM +0200, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> > > add trivial device tree binding "devantech,srf02" and "devantech,srf10"
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
> > > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt | 2 ++
> >
> > Again: This file has moved since v4.12-rc1. Please rebase to v4.12 or
> > even v4.13-rc5.
> >
>
> Then i split the patch series up in two parts:
> - patch with only device tree binding against >= v4.12
> - everything else as patch series against git tree of IIO
>
> Ok?
Wooha, the master branch of iio.git is at v4.11? I see. So, this is the
culprit, sorry! @Jonathan: is that the branch people should develop on,
or is it your testing branch?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists