linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock params

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd5g470uRHdW_ZgN3MkCW8=ztow7vJobtye5-BBbUN+=R9SUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 13 Aug 2017 20:52:26 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Rick Altherr <raltherr@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Robi Buranyi <rburanyi@...gle.com>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: aspeed: add proper support fo 24xx clock params

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
>> That being said, I could implement this as a custom clock subclass, which
>> would probably be cleaner that what I have done.
>
> Shall I wait for that one or do you want this patch to be included?
> I don't mind, your call here...
>

Let's go ahead with this patch. I do not have too much experience with the
clock stuff, so I imagine that will probably take some back and forth.

Thanks!