[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aac7b5f1-5c5e-e716-af49-bc150449ddbc@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:39:17 -0400
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
x86@...nel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
willy@...radead.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, sam@...nborg.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [v6 04/15] mm: discard memblock data later
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMBLOCK in page_alloc, or define memblock_discard() stubs in
>> nobootmem headfile.
>
> This is the standard way to do this. And it is usually preferred to
> proliferate ifdefs in the code.
Hi Michal,
As you suggested, I sent-out this patch separately. If you feel
strongly, that this should be updated to have stubs for platforms that
do not implement memblock, please send a reply to that e-mail, so those
who do not follow this tread will see it. Otherwise, I can leave it as
is, page_alloc file already has a number memblock related ifdefs all of
which can be cleaned out once every platform implements it (is it even
achievable?)
Thank you,
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists