linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ghes_edac: avoid multiple calls to dmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:57:35 +0000
From:   "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
To:     "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ghes_edac: avoid multiple calls to dmi_walk()

On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 11:04 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 05:59:15PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > I think we should keep the current scheme, which registers an mci
> > for
> 
> No we shouldn't.
> 
> > each GHES entry.  ghes_edac_report_mem_error() expects that error-
> > reporting is serialized per a GHES entry.  Sharing a single mci
> > among all GHES entries / error interfaces might lead to a race
> > condition.
> 
> See how I solved it in my patchset and feel free to reuse it.

Hmm... Sorry, I failed to see how your patchset solved it.  Would you
mind to explain how it is done?

Thanks!
-Toshi