[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170814162219.GX8569@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:22:20 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: twl: move header file out of I2C realm
* Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> [170814 01:43]:
>
> > > Given the triviality of the change for non-MFD subsystems, can we apply
> > > this for 4.14?
> >
> > I can't apply anything without Acks for *all* of the subsystems above.
>
> Well, there are cases when you can. Those should be exceptions and well
> justified, of course.
>
> > My suggestion would be to collect the Acks you've received up until
> > this point and identify which SS's are still lacking in change log
> > section of a RESEND.
>
> I agree, though, that I can try a second round to get the acks.
As long as it's been compile tested with omap2plus_defconfig:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists