[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170814162413.GC9559@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:24:13 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE and init again
Hi Jamie,
On 08/14, Jamie Iles wrote:
>
> > > Not sure, let me think a bit more... and this is not enough anyway.
> > >
> > > perhaps we should start with this simple change, but the "real" fix
> > > needs a lot of cleanups, although I am not sure if we will ever do this.
> >
> > Okay, sounds good. I'm happy to spend more time looking at this if you
> > have suggestions - in the context of namespaces and containers this
> > seems more relevant than when it was just the system init that we were
> > protecting.
>
> Any objections to moving ahead with this patch?
Oh, sorry.
OK, lets do this simple change then try to improve this logic further.
I'm afraid you need to re-send your patch, sorry.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists