[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170814163150.GA4114@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 13:31:50 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] perf annotate stdio: Support --show-nr-samples
option
Em Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 07:42:07PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> On 08/01/2017 03:24 PM, Taeung Song wrote:
> > On 07/29/2017 01:26 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:16:16AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> > > > Add --show-nr-samples option to perf-annotate
> > > > so that it corresponds with perf-report.
> > >
> > > So this is not that intuitive, i.e. if one ask for:
> > >
> > > perf annotate --show-total-period --show-nr-samples
> > >
> > > then both should appear, no?
> > I thought the users can use both --show-total-period and --show-nr-samples,
> > but perf-annotate can preferentially show the total period view IMHO.
That is inapropriate, if the user asks for both --show-total-period and
--show-nr-samples, then it either should show both or bail out telling
that that is not possible.
- Arnaldo
> > What do you think about it ?
> > we need to prevent users from using both ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Taeung
>
>
> ping !
>
> >
> > > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
> > > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 2 ++
> > > > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 +++++-
> > > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> > > > b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> > > > index 6db782d..a8e6db2 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> > > > @@ -447,6 +447,8 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv)
> > > > "Show event group information together"),
> > > > OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "show-total-period",
> > > > &symbol_conf.show_total_period,
> > > > "Show a column with the sum of periods"),
> > > > + OPT_BOOLEAN('n', "show-nr-samples", &symbol_conf.show_nr_samples,
> > > > + "Show a column with the number of samples"),
> > > > OPT_CALLBACK_DEFAULT(0, "stdio-color", NULL, "mode",
> > > > "'always' (default), 'never' or 'auto' only
> > > > applicable to --stdio mode",
> > > > stdio__config_color, "always"),
> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > > > index 5125c2b..7032bdc 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > > > @@ -1144,6 +1144,9 @@ static int disasm_line__print(struct
> > > > disasm_line *dl, struct symbol *sym, u64 st
> > > > if (symbol_conf.show_total_period)
> > > > color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %11" PRIu64,
> > > > sample.period);
> > > > + else if (symbol_conf.show_nr_samples)
> > > > + color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %7" PRIu64,
> > > > + sample.nr_samples);
> > > > else
> > > > color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %7.2f", percent);
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -1824,7 +1827,8 @@ int symbol__annotate_printf(struct symbol
> > > > *sym, struct map *map,
> > > > width *= evsel->nr_members;
> > > > graph_dotted_len = printf(" %-*.*s| Source code &
> > > > Disassembly of %s for %s (%" PRIu64 " samples)\n",
> > > > - width, width, symbol_conf.show_total_period ?
> > > > "Event count" : "Percent",
> > > > + width, width, symbol_conf.show_total_period ?
> > > > "Event count" :
> > > > + symbol_conf.show_nr_samples ? "Samples" : "Percent",
> > > > d_filename, evsel_name, h->nr_samples);
> > > > printf("%-*.*s----\n",
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists