[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170814160522.4f9b517a@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:05:22 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
mikey@...ling.org, stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, apopple@....ibm.com,
hbabu@...ibm.com, oohall@...il.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/17] powerpc/vas: Define macros, register fields
and structures
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:21:48 +1000
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/vas.h | 35 ++++
> > arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/vas.h | 25 +++
>
> I thought we weren't exposing VAS to userspace yet?
>
> If we are then we need to get things straight WRT copy/paste abort.
No we should not be. This might be just a leftover hunk that should
be moved to a future series.
At the moment (as far as I understand) it should be limited to
preempt-disabled, process context, kernel users which avoids any
concern for switch_to.
Thanks,
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists