lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:04:47 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roy Franz <roy.franz@...ium.com>,
        Harb Abdulhamid <harba@...eaurora.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@....com>,
        Ryan Harkin <Ryan.Harkin@....com>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] hwmon: add support for sensors exported via ARM
 SCMI

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 04:09:18PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> On 07/08/17 13:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 04/08/17 20:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 03:31:42PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >>> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scmi_sensors);
> >>> +
> >>> +	hwdev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups(dev, "scmi_sensors",
> >>> +						       scmi_sensors,
> >>> +						       scmi_sensors->groups);
> >>
> >> Can you rework this to use devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(),
> >> and if possible let it handle the thermal registration ? 
> >>
> > 
> > Thanks for the pointers. I will check on the possibility and use it if
> > possible.
> > 
> 
> I had a look at devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info. It mostly deals
> with constant structures where all the attributes are known at the boot
> time. In case of SCMI, the firmware presents all the sensors and all the
> information(type, scale, name/label, ...etc). Unless I create those
> structures dynamically and typecast as const during probe, I can't get
> it working. Are you OK with that ? If so, I can try making those changes.
> 

Yes, please.

What operations exactly fail, though ? The idea was that the structures
are not modified by the infrastructure code, not that they must be constant
in the driver. Maybe some of the structure definitions are simply wrong. 

Thanks,
Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ