linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nokia n900: update dts with camera support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170814201950.sbtyuksn3ntuigyp@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 14 Aug 2017 23:19:50 +0300
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
        aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
        patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nokia n900: update dts with camera support

Hi Pavel,

Thanks for the patch.

I understand Tony already applied this one. I'd have a few comments below,
could you address them in another patch, please?

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:49:23PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Add camera support to N900 dts. Also add a note about MMC & debugging.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> 
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts
> index 49f3708..b1be53d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts
> @@ -144,6 +144,15 @@
>  		io-channel-names = "temp", "bsi", "vbat";
>  	};
>  
> +	rear_camera: camera@0 {
> +		compatible = "linux,camera";
> +
> +		module {
> +			model = "TCM8341MD";
> +			sensor = <&cam1>;
> +		};
> +	};

There's no reference to rear_camera. I understand that this represents the
camera module but as we don't have any documented way to describe camera
modules (nor we have really discussed the matter), this should be removed
for now.

Perhaps later on, but I be it'd look quite different.

> +
>  	pwm9: dmtimer-pwm {
>  		compatible = "ti,omap-dmtimer-pwm";
>  		#pwm-cells = <3>;
> @@ -164,6 +173,31 @@
>  	};
>  };
>  
> +&isp {
> +	vdds_csib-supply = <&vaux2>;
> +
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&camera_pins>;
> +
> +	ports {
> +		port@1 {
> +			reg = <1>;
> +
> +			csi_isp: endpoint {
> +				remote-endpoint = <&csi_cam1>;
> +				bus-type = <3>; /* CCP2 */
> +				clock-lanes = <1>;
> +				data-lanes = <0>;
> +				lane-polarity = <0 0>;
> +				clock-inv = <0>;
> +				/* Select strobe = <1> for back camera, <0> for front camera */
> +				strobe = <1>;
> +				crc = <0>;

crc is not a documented binding in video-interfaces.txt. Same for
clock-inv. clock-inv is used by v4l2-fwnode.c already. Describing both in
video-interfaces.txt would certainly make sense though, as well as adding
support for crc in CCP2 to V4L2 fwnode.

Could you submit patches for that? I can do that as well but it'll probably
take some days at least.

> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
> +};
> +
>  &omap3_pmx_core {
>  	pinctrl-names = "default";
>  
> @@ -328,6 +362,22 @@
>  			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x218e, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE4)		/* gpio 157 => cmt_bsi */
>  		>;
>  	};
> +
> +	camera_pins: pinmux_camera {
> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x210c, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE7)       /* cam_hs */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x210e, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE7)       /* cam_vs */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x2110, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE0)       /* cam_xclka */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x211e, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE7)       /* cam_d4 */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x2122, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE0)        /* cam_d6 */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x2124, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE0)        /* cam_d7 */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x2126, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE0)        /* cam_d8 */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x2128, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE0)        /* cam_d9 */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x212a, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE7)       /* cam_d10 */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x212e, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE7)       /* cam_xclkb */
> +			OMAP3_CORE1_IOPAD(0x2132, PIN_OUTPUT | MUX_MODE0)       /* cam_strobe */
> +		>;
> +	};
>  };
>  
>  &i2c1 {
> @@ -726,6 +776,40 @@
>  		st,max-limit-y = <32>;
>  		st,max-limit-z = <32>;
>  	};
> +
> +	cam1: camera@3e {
> +		compatible = "toshiba,et8ek8";
> +		reg = <0x3e>;
> +
> +		vana-supply = <&vaux4>;
> +
> +		clocks = <&isp 0>;
> +		clock-names = "extclk";
> +		clock-frequency = <9600000>;
> +
> +		reset-gpio = <&gpio4 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* 102 */
> +
> +		port {
> +			csi_cam1: endpoint {
> +				bus-type = <3>; /* CCP2 */
> +				strobe = <1>;
> +				clock-inv = <0>;
> +				crc = <1>;
> +
> +				remote-endpoint = <&csi_isp>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	/* D/A converter for auto-focus */
> +	ad5820: dac@0c {
> +		compatible = "adi,ad5820";
> +		reg = <0x0c>;
> +
> +		VANA-supply = <&vaux4>;
> +
> +		#io-channel-cells = <0>;
> +	};
>  };
>  
>  &mmc1 {
> @@ -733,6 +817,9 @@
>  	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>;
>  	vmmc-supply = <&vmmc1>;
>  	bus-width = <4>;
> +	/* For debugging, it is often good idea to remove this GPIO.
> +	   It means you can remove back cover (to reboot by removing
> +	   battery) and still use the MMC card. */
>  	cd-gpios = <&gpio6 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* 160 */
>  };
>  
> 

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@....fi