[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY4PR21MB0182025BB8A39FB3F7291F94A08C0@CY4PR21MB0182.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:02:31 +0000
From: Tom Talpey <ttalpey@...rosoft.com>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>, Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
"linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
"samba-technical@...ts.samba.org" <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [[PATCH v1] 23/37] [CIFS] SMBD: Implement API for upper layer to
reconnect transport
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-cifs-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-cifs-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Long Li
> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 4:11 PM
> To: Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>; linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org; samba-
> technical@...ts.samba.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> Subject: [[PATCH v1] 23/37] [CIFS] SMBD: Implement API for upper layer to
> reconnect transport
>
> +int cifs_reconnect_rdma_session(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> +{
> + log_rdma_event("reconnecting rdma session\n");
> +
> + // why reconnect while it is still connected?
> + if (server->rdma_ses->transport_status == CIFS_RDMA_CONNECTED) {
> + log_rdma_event("still connected, not reconnecting\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Why is this check needed?
> +
> + // wait until the transport is destroyed
> + while (server->rdma_ses->transport_status != CIFS_RDMA_DESTROYED)
> + msleep(1);
Polling!? Please plan to implement a proper handshake for connection logic.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists