[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170815033258.GD91145@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 20:32:58 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Cc: chao@...nel.org, yuchao0@...wei.com, yunlong.song@...oud.com,
miaoxie@...wei.com, bintian.wang@...wei.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: free_user_blocks should use reserved_segments
instead
On 08/14, Yunlong Song wrote:
> The part (overprovision_segments - reserved_segments) can still be used for LFS,
> so free_use_blocks should use reserved_segments instead, rather than use
> overprovision_segments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/gc.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.h b/fs/f2fs/gc.h
> index 9325191..6258305 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.h
> @@ -49,10 +49,10 @@ struct gc_inode_list {
> */
> static inline block_t free_user_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
NAK. This gives user-visible block count.
> {
> - if (free_segments(sbi) < overprovision_segments(sbi))
> + if (free_segments(sbi) < reserved_segments(sbi))
> return 0;
> else
> - return (free_segments(sbi) - overprovision_segments(sbi))
> + return (free_segments(sbi) - reserved_segments(sbi))
> << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists