[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170815075102.19094-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 08:51:02 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove redundant check on ret being non-zero
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The error return variable ret is initialized to zero and then is
checked to see if it is non-zero in the if-block that follows it.
It is therefore impossible for ret to be non-zero after the if-block
hence the check is redundant and can be removed.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1021040 ("Logically dead code")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 3a11ae63676e..f05fcc67efa6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -1143,8 +1143,6 @@ static inline int __add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
goto again;
}
kfree(victim_name);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
next:
cur_offset += victim_name_len + sizeof(*extref);
}
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists