[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170815122915.GF29067@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:29:16 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Argangeli <andrea@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Wenwei Tao <wenwei.tww@...baba-inc.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm, oom: fix oom_reaper fallouts
On Mon 07-08-17 13:38:37, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> there are two issues this patch series attempts to fix. First one is
> something that has been broken since MMF_UNSTABLE flag introduction
> and I guess we should backport it stable trees (patch 1). The other
> issue has been brought up by Wenwei Tao and Tetsuo Handa has created
> a test case to trigger it very reliably. I am not yet sure this is a
> stable material because the test case is rather artificial. If there is
> a demand for the stable backport I will prepare it, of course, though.
>
> I hope I've done the second patch correctly but I would definitely
> appreciate some more eyes on it. Hence CCing Andrea and Kirill. My
> previous attempt with some more context was posted here
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170803135902.31977-1-mhocko@kernel.org
>
> My testing didn't show anything unusual with these two applied on top of
> the mmotm tree.
unless anybody object can we have this merged? Whether to push this to
the stable tree is still questionable because it requires a rather
artificial workload to trigger the issue but if others think it would be
better to have it backported I will prepare backports for all relevant
stable trees.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists