linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: fix incorrect value assigned to req->response

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170815152259.idjvtw5tdg24xj2o@mwanda>
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:22:59 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: fix incorrect value assigned to
 req->response_type

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:38:34PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:31:33PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > 
> > req->response_type is being assigned the sizeof TB_CFG_PKG_RESET
> > and should actually be assigned TB_CFG_PKG_RESET. Fix this.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> IIRC I already acked this some time ago ;-)
> 
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> BTW, you should CC Greg as he has been gathering Thunderbolt related
> patches. I added him now.

Yeah.  I sent this patch on Jun 14.  "[PATCH] thunderbolt: Fix reset
response_type"  I didn't CC Greg, either.  Someone should probably
update MAINTAINERS if Greg needs to get these emails.

Colin, could you please add Fixes tags to your patches?  It helps me
investigate how bugs are introduced.  I know we all had a long thread
and agreed to not add them if the patch probably doesn't fix a user
visible bug, but this one is clearly a bugfix.

regards,
dan carpenter