[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwFr4tDeVH+G7QwFWV+rUdDLQTvFrPX+ZT3wOx4Ew5tMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:28:01 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"babu.moger@...cle.com" <babu.moger@...cle.com>,
"atomlin@...hat.com" <atomlin@...hat.com>,
"prarit@...hat.com" <prarit@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"acme@...hat.com" <acme@...hat.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] kernel/watchdog: fix spurious hard lockups
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Liang, Kan <kan.liang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> We have confirmed that the hardlock with "speed up the hrtimer" patch is
> actually another issue.
Good.
However:
> Tim has already proposed a patch to fix it.
> Here is his patch. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/14/1000
Ugh. I hate that patch, and hope we can find a proper fix for it. But
I'll respond separately to it, and it's independent of the watchdog
issue.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists