linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/12] irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13319270.gRd1cmLsry@np-p-burton>
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:23:38 -0700
From:   Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
        "Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
        Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target

Hi Marc,

On Tuesday, 15 August 2017 04:34:46 PDT Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The MIPS GIC driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if
> the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code
> about this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig        | 1 +
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 39bfa5b25b54..bca9a88012f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ config IRQ_MIPS_CPU
>  	select GENERIC_IRQ_IPI if SYS_SUPPORTS_MULTITHREADING
>  	select IRQ_DOMAIN
>  	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY if GENERIC_IRQ_IPI
> +	select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
> 
>  config CLPS711X_IRQCHIP
>  	bool
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> index 6ab1d3afec02..e075cb25fad6 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const
> struct cpumask *cpumask, set_bit(irq,
> pcpu_masks[cpumask_first(&tmp)].pcpu_mask);
> 
>  	cpumask_copy(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), cpumask);
> +	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask);

This doesn't seem right - it's just setting the effective affinity to the same 
as affinity, not taking into account CPU restrictions at all. I think this 
should be:

  irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpumask_first(&tmp)));

(or something cleaner but to that effect)

Thanks,
    Paul

>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
> 
>  	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY;
> @@ -716,6 +717,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d,
> unsigned int virq, if (err)
>  			return err;
> 
> +		irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq)));
>  		return gic_shared_irq_domain_map(d, virq, hwirq, 0);
>  	}


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)