[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170815163141.GD18688@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:31:41 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com, glider@...gle.com,
dvyukov@...gle.com, kcc@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
lucien.xin@...il.com, vyasevich@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sctp: fully initialize the IPv6 address in
sctp_v6_to_addr()
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:37:49AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 12:05 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>
> > Ok, but I should see a difference in the generated code, right?
>
> Depends on the compiler. Have you tried older versions ?
>
This was with gcc 6.4.1, fc25 standard. Only tested with it and didn't
check clang either.
> One argument is that following struct member definition eases code
> review.
>
> (It is easier to catch a field init is missing)
And a good one, yes.
Thanks,
Marcelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists