[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7921a233-6971-6e3b-9164-01d6176d61c0@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:31:14 -0600
From: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, gengdongjiu <gengdj.1984@...il.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
john.garry@...wei.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
zhengqiang10@...wei.com, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
huangshaoyu@...wei.com, wuquanming@...wei.com, james.morse@....com,
geliangtang@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, austinwc@...eaurora.org,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
huangdaode@...ilicon.com, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: apei: fix the wrongly iterate generic error
status block
On 8/15/2017 10:55 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:42:43AM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> I ever discuss it with Tyler about it, as shown below link, thanks
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/14/355
> Tyler's patch fixes ghes_do_proc() - yours cper_estatus_print(). How is
> that merged?
>
Hello Boris,
His patch fixes the define for apei_estatus_for_each_section which in
turn should fix ghes_do_proc(). So my patch should no longer be needed.
I'm going to test this out just to verify if fixes the issue I found.
Dongjiu,
This patch changes cper_estatus_print() to use
apei_estatus_for_each_section. Can you also make that same change to
cper_estatus_check() since that function is doing the same iteration?
Thanks,
Tyler
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists