linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] xen/pvcalls: implement release command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2fd1b3f3-28aa-1958-7522-766c7d92e8d3@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:44:12 -0400
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgross@...e.com,
        Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] xen/pvcalls: implement release command

On 07/31/2017 06:57 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Send PVCALLS_RELEASE to the backend and wait for a reply. Take both
> in_mutex and out_mutex to avoid concurrent accesses. Then, free the
> socket.
>
> For passive sockets, check whether we have already pre-allocated an
> active socket for the purpose of being accepted. If so, free that as
> well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
> CC: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
> CC: jgross@...e.com
> ---
>  drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> index 1c975d6..775a6d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,23 @@ static irqreturn_t pvcalls_front_conn_handler(int irq, void *sock_map)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> +static void pvcalls_front_free_map(struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata,
> +				   struct sock_mapping *map)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +	if (!list_empty(&map->list))
> +		list_del_init(&map->list);
> +	spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < (1 << map->active.ring->ring_order); i++)
> +		gnttab_end_foreign_access(map->active.ring->ref[i], 0, 0);
> +	gnttab_end_foreign_access(map->active.ref, 0, 0);
> +	free_page((unsigned long)map->active.ring);
> +	unbind_from_irqhandler(map->active.irq, map);

Would it better to first unbind the handler? Any chance an interrupt
might come in?

> +}
> +
>  int pvcalls_front_socket(struct socket *sock)
>  {
>  	struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
> @@ -853,6 +870,77 @@ unsigned int pvcalls_front_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
>  		return pvcalls_front_poll_passive(file, bedata, map, wait);
>  }
>  
> +int pvcalls_front_release(struct socket *sock)
> +{
> +	struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
> +	struct sock_mapping *map;
> +	int req_id, notify, ret;
> +	struct xen_pvcalls_request *req;
> +
> +	if (!pvcalls_front_dev)
> +		return -EIO;
> +	bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev);
> +
> +	if (sock->sk == NULL)
> +		return 0;

This can go above bedata access.

(You are going to address locking here so I won't review the rest)

-boris

> +
> +	map = (struct sock_mapping *) READ_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_send_head);
> +	if (map == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +	ret = get_request(bedata, &req_id);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	WRITE_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_send_head, NULL);
> +
> +	req = RING_GET_REQUEST(&bedata->ring, req_id);
> +	req->req_id = req_id;
> +	req->cmd = PVCALLS_RELEASE;
> +	req->u.release.id = (uint64_t)map;
> +
> +	bedata->ring.req_prod_pvt++;
> +	RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&bedata->ring, notify);
> +	spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +	if (notify)
> +		notify_remote_via_irq(bedata->irq);
> +
> +	wait_event(bedata->inflight_req,
> +		   READ_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id) == req_id);
> +
> +	if (map->active_socket) {
> +		/* 
> +		 * Set in_error and wake up inflight_conn_req to force
> +		 * recvmsg waiters to exit.
> +		 */
> +		map->active.ring->in_error = -EBADF;
> +		wake_up_interruptible(&map->active.inflight_conn_req);
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&map->active.in_mutex);
> +		mutex_lock(&map->active.out_mutex);
> +		pvcalls_front_free_map(bedata, map);
> +		mutex_unlock(&map->active.out_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&map->active.in_mutex);
> +		kfree(map);
> +	} else {
> +		spin_lock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +		if (READ_ONCE(map->passive.inflight_req_id) !=
> +		    PVCALLS_INVALID_ID) {
> +			pvcalls_front_free_map(bedata,
> +					       map->passive.accept_map);
> +			kfree(map->passive.accept_map);
> +		}
> +		list_del_init(&map->list);
> +		kfree(map);
> +		spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +	}
> +	WRITE_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id, PVCALLS_INVALID_ID);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct xenbus_device_id pvcalls_front_ids[] = {
>  	{ "pvcalls" },
>  	{ "" }
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> index 25e05b8..3332978 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> @@ -23,5 +23,6 @@ int pvcalls_front_recvmsg(struct socket *sock,
>  unsigned int pvcalls_front_poll(struct file *file,
>  				struct socket *sock,
>  				poll_table *wait);
> +int pvcalls_front_release(struct socket *sock);
>  
>  #endif