linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Automatically create cpufreq device with OPP v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v65arhOb3-zLuHj3MM38vT8OJHXoi=k3RG+F4Lou0N3VTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:49:11 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        jun.nie@...aro.org, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Automatically create cpufreq
 device with OPP v2

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> The initial idea of creating the cpufreq-dt-platdev.c file was to keep a
> list of platforms that use the "operating-points" (V1) bindings and
> create cpufreq device for them only, as we weren't sure which platforms
> would want the device to get created automatically as some had their own
> cpufreq drivers as well, or wanted to initialize cpufreq after doing
> some stuff from platform code.
>
> But that wasn't the case with platforms using "operating-points-v2"
> property. We wanted the device to get created automatically without the
> need of adding them to the whitelist. Though, we will still have some
> exceptions where we don't want to create the device automatically.
>
> Rename the earlier platform list as *whitelist* and create a new
> *blacklist* as well.
>
> The cpufreq-dt device will get created if:
> - The platform is there in the whitelist OR
> - The platform has "operating-points-v2" property in CPU0's DT node and
>   isn't part of the blacklist .
>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Does this mean "cpufreq: dt: Add support for some new Allwinner SoCs",
or any other patch adding new SoCs to the list, isn't needed anymore?

ChenYu