[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hNe6FiAUGV7nZGAz_DAyQLEAHD_ANqt2jU8ZmUJpHJ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:15:08 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] fs, xfs: introduce MAP_DIRECT for creating
block-map-sealed file ranges
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>> On Mon 14-08-17 23:12:22, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>>> index ff151814a02d..73fdc0ada9ee 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>>> @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
>>> struct mm_struct *vm_mm; /* The address space we belong to. */
>>> pgprot_t vm_page_prot; /* Access permissions of this VMA. */
>>> unsigned long vm_flags; /* Flags, see mm.h. */
>>> + unsigned long fs_flags; /* fs flags, see MAP_DIRECT etc */
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * For areas with an address space and backing store,
>>
>> Ah, OK, here are VMA flags I was missing in the previous patch :) But why
>> did you create separate fs_flags field for this? on 64-bit archs there's
>> still space in vm_flags and frankly I don't see why we should separate
>> MAP_DIRECT or MAP_SYNC from other flags?
>
> Where would MAP_DIRECT go in the 32-bit case?
>
>> After all a difference in these
>> flags must also prevent VMA merging (which you forgot to handle I think)
>> and they need to be copied on split (which happens by chance even now).
>
> Ah, yes I did miss blocking the merge of a vma with MAP_DIRECT and one
> without. However, the vma split path looks ok.
The merge path already blocks merging vmas that have the ->close()
operation defined in is_mergeable_vma().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists