[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8f9d2c6-2466-1dfc-b7b7-bd5961e76b3b@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:56:10 +0800
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] s390/topology: Remove the unused parent_node()
macro
Hi Heiko,
At 07/27/2017 04:19 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:34:31PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> Commit a7be6e5a7f8d ("mm: drop useless local parameters of
>> __register_one_node()") removes the last user of parent_node().
>>
>> The parent_node() macro in S390 platform is unnecessary.
>>
>> Remove it for cleanup.
>>
>> Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>> Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
>> ---
>
> Are arch maintainers supposed to pick these patches up?
>
Yes, As Michael said, It seems these patches are merging individually.
can you merge this patch in s390 tree?
> In any case: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>
>
Thanks,
dou.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists