linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: slave-eeprom: Add an OF device ID table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170816134112.GA1391@katana>
Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:41:12 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: slave-eeprom: Add an OF device ID table


> What kind of change are you looking for? The example was introduced by commit
> 04606ccc84e3 ("i2c: designware: introducing I2C_SLAVE definitions") that says:
> 
> - A example was added to designware-core.txt Documentation that shows
>   how the slave can be setup using DTS

My fault, I missed it :(

> So I could change this example to instead use a real EEPROM compatible (e.g:
> "microchip,24c02") instead of "linux,slave-24c02". Would that be correct?

I think this is Luis call how he'd like this to be changed. Given the
current discussion, I'd think it must be dropped entirely.

Luis?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)