[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJaK=xgrzecf3PnPuNSzsnzdvuJ9NZ4uzs4u9Oc77sV2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:46:21 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
Cc: "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jslaby@...e.com" <jslaby@...e.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] earlycon: initialise baud field of earlycon device structure
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev
<Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 14:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
>> <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com> wrote:
>> > [snip]
>> > @@ -282,7 +283,15 @@ int __init of_setup_earlycon(const struct
>> > earlycon_id *match,
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > + val = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "baud", NULL);
>>
>> No, we already have a defined way to set the baud, we don't need a
>> property in addition. Plus you didn't document it.
>
> I guess by defined way to set the baud you mean setting baud after
> device alias
> in stdout-path property (like stdout-path = "serial:115200n8"), right?
>
> The idea was to reuse "baud" property from serial node to set the
> earlycon baud:
>
> chosen {
> ...
> stdout-path = &serial;
> };
>
> serial: uart@... {
> ...
> baud = <115200>; /* Get baud from here */
"current-speed" is already defined for this purpose. If you want to
add that, that's fine.
> };
>
>> > + if (val)
>> > + early_console_dev.baud = be32_to_cpu(*val);
>> > +
>> > if (options) {
>> > + err = kstrtoul(options, 10, &baud);
>> > + if (!err)
>> > + early_console_dev.baud = baud;
>>
>> This seems fine to do here, but then we should also parse the other
>> standard options here too. And we should make sure we're not doing it
>> twice.
> I added only baud parsing here because we parse only baud from standard
> options
> when register_earlycon is used. (see parse_options function which is
> called
> from register_earlycon)
>
> But I can add other standard options parsing here (probably using
> uart_parse_options + uart_set_options).
> What do you think?
That seems fine as long as consoles can still have their own options.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists