[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170816125935.6fde64ca@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:59:35 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] completion: Document that reinit_completion() must be
called after complete_all()
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:47:38 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > The function complete_all() modifies the completion "done" variable to
> > UINT_MAX, and no other caller (wait_for_completion(), etc) will modify
> > it back to zero. That means that any call to complete_all() must have a
> > reinit_completion() before that completion can be used again.
> >
> > Document this fact by the complete_all() function.
>
> I think this is misleading.
>
> People reading that comment will just say "why doesn't complete_all()
> just reinit the thing then?"
>
> So the comment should probably say that it needs to be reinited after
> all the existing completion users have actually woken up, so that it
> explains why the reinit isn't just done by complete_all().
>
Agreed. I'll send a v2.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists