linux-kernel - [PATCH 7/7] sched/core: Don't change the affinity of DL tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1502918443-30169-8-git-send-email-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:20:43 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     tj@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, lizefan@...wei.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
        juri.lelli@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
        luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it, bristot@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] sched/core: Don't change the affinity of DL tasks

Now that we mandate that on creation, the ->cpus_allowed mask of a future
DL task has to be equal to the rd->span of the root domain it will be
associated with, changing the affinity of a DL task doesn't make sense
anymore.

Indeed, if we set the task to a smaller affinity set then we may be running
out of CPU cycle.  If we try to increase the size of the affinity set the
new CPUs are necessarily part of another root domain where DL utilation for
the task won't be accounted for.

As such simply refuse to change the affinity set of a DL task.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0869b20fba81..a1948d127d8f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4629,15 +4629,15 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
 	cpumask_and(new_mask, in_mask, cpus_allowed);
 
 	/*
-	 * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis,
-	 * if admission test is enabled, we only admit -deadline
-	 * tasks allowed to run on all the CPUs in the task's
-	 * root_domain.
+	 * Since bandwidth control happens on root_domain basis, if admission
+	 * test is enabled, we don't allow the task' CPUs to change.  If
+	 * @new_mask is smaller than we risk running out of cycles.  If it is
+	 * bigger than we may be using DL bandwidth allocated to other CPUs.
 	 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) {
 		rcu_read_lock();
-		if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) {
+		if (!cpumask_equal(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) {
 			retval = -EBUSY;
 			rcu_read_unlock();
 			goto out_free_new_mask;
-- 
2.7.4