[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyJsxsxeW-8RX83AM2zs+_i8h85i99X+YkuFEqpqjtp4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:58:02 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...onical.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] devpts: use dynamic_dname() to generate proc name
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> tty->link->driver_data = pts_path;
>>
>> retval = ptm_driver->ops->open(tty, filp);
> ^^^^^^^
>
> If this open fails the code jumps to err_put_path which falls
> through into out_put_fsi.
No it doesn't.
err_path_put falls through to err_release, but that then does a
"return retval;". It doesn't get to out_put_fsi.
Now, I _do_ want people to check the release path, but I don't think
this was it. Or am I blind and missing something?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists