[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1503003532.2042.161.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:08:40 +0000
From: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
To: "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ghes_edac: avoid multiple calls to dmi_walk()
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 11:51 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 19:40 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 05:28:50PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
:
> > > I will test the patch with an SCI when I got a chance. I won't
> > > be able to test other notification types or race conditions,
> > > though.
> >
> > Thanks, here's the latest version with the atomic registration too.
>
> Sure, I will test with this version.
I briefly tested the patch with an SCI. The error reporting part seems
to work fine.
There are two issues I noticed:
1. It creates mc0 and mc1.
I think this is because you called edac_mc_alloc() with mc_num 1.
2. 'ras-mc-ctl --layout' does not show all DIMMs.
# ras-mc-ctl --layout
+------------------------+
| mc0 | mc1 |
---------+------------------------+
memory4: | 0 MB | 16384 MB |
memory3: | 0 MB | 0 MB |
memory2: | 0 MB | 0 MB |
memory1: | 0 MB | 0 MB |
memory0: | 0 MB | 8192 MB |
---------+-----------------------+
# ls /sys/bus/mc1/devices
csrow0 csrow12 csrow23 dimm0 dimm12 dimm23 mc1
csrow11 csrow19 csrow4 dimm11 dimm19 dimm4
Thanks,
-Toshi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists