[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANk1AXRQfGViXn+vEErmN6N8LtOsX7Arh-VPPbDjKiEyGGvV-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:31:56 -0500
From: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
To: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, "Kang, Luwei" <luwei.kang@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Yi Z" <yi.z.zhang@...el.com>,
Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@...el.com>,
Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@...el.com>,
Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@...el.com>,
Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@...el.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/22] fpga: intel: pcie: adds fpga_for_each_port
callback for fme device
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com> wrote:
Hi Hao,
> For FPGA Management Engine (FME), it requires fpga_for_each_port callback
> for actions on ports, so export this function from PCIe driver by adding
> the callback to the platform data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> ---
> v2: rebased
> ---
> drivers/fpga/intel-feature-dev.h | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/fpga/intel-pcie.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel-feature-dev.h b/drivers/fpga/intel-feature-dev.h
> index d64a51e..06b3fb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/intel-feature-dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel-feature-dev.h
> @@ -235,6 +235,9 @@ struct feature_platform_data {
> struct platform_device *dev;
> unsigned int disable_count; /* count for port disable */
>
> + struct platform_device *(*fpga_for_each_port)(struct platform_device *,
> + void *, int (*match)(struct platform_device *, void *));
> +
> int num; /* number of features */
> struct feature features[0];
> };
> @@ -354,4 +357,10 @@ static inline int fpga_port_reset(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> return pdata->features[index].ioaddr;
> }
> +
> +static inline struct device *
> +fpga_feature_dev_to_pcidev(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> + return dev->dev.parent->parent;
> +}
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel-pcie.c b/drivers/fpga/intel-pcie.c
> index 54c0e3a..86ea5c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/intel-pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel-pcie.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,27 @@ static int parse_switch_to(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo, int bar)
> return parse_start_from(binfo, bar);
> }
>
> +static struct platform_device *fpga_for_each_port(struct platform_device *pdev,
Regarding the name of this function, isn't this more of a 'find'
function like class_find_device() than a 'for_each' function?
Also please document that the caller will need to put_device().
Thanks,
Alan
> + void *data, int (*match)(struct platform_device *, void *))
> +{
> + struct device *pci_dev = fpga_feature_dev_to_pcidev(pdev);
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(pci_dev);
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata;
> + struct platform_device *port_dev;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(pdata, &drvdata->port_dev_list, node) {
> + port_dev = pdata->dev;
> +
> + if (match(port_dev, data) && get_device(&port_dev->dev))
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + port_dev = NULL;
> +exit:
> + mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
> + return port_dev;
> +}
> +
> static struct build_feature_devs_info *
> build_info_alloc_and_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> @@ -310,6 +331,9 @@ static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> if (!pdata)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + if (type == FME_ID)
> + pdata->fpga_for_each_port = fpga_for_each_port;
> +
> /*
> * the count should be initialized to 0 to make sure
> *__fpga_port_enable() following __fpga_port_disable()
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists